About CommentOnThis.comThis is a site designed to make it easier to take the core of large published reports and allow anyone to comment on them. More... |
Comments:How this is done is key to the foundation of trust in e-government. This clear statement envisages a separate path from the Home Office IPS route. That's a good start. I think (fingers crossed) that David Varney is in favour of something which appeals to customers. Selling mobile phones (as he did at O2) is different from bunging people in jail and other stuff they do at the Home Office: to succeed at the former you have to work hard to keep your customers happy. Posted by William on 2006-12-30 15:06:03. Link. Report abuse to tgs-abuse@msmith.net. Back to the main document list
The use of the past tense is curious. I thought this was all work in progress. IPS have produced the “Strategic Action Plan for the National Identity Scheme”. The CTO has produced the first release of “The cross-Government Enterprise Architecture (xGEA)”. Where is the IDM strategy paper – perhaps I just haven’t found it yet? I agree - past tense is odd. I thought the pilot was proposed here. Posted by William on 2007-01-31 20:35:04. Link. Report abuse to tgs-abuse@msmith.net. Back to the main document listComment |