This is a site designed to make it easier to take the core of large published reports and allow anyone to comment on them.


3.7 Option 1 would impose costs on claimants in the future, as it would leave them without an adequate legal protection for taking legal action against defamatory material republished or accessed at any time after the expiry of the initial limitation period, and they would be unable to take action to protect their reputation in these circumstances. It would also leave them with no recourse should they not find out about the initial defamatory publication until after the expiration of the limitation period. The costs although personal could in many instances impact on their private businesses and long term careers, with significant future earnings foregone.

Email this to a friend.
Previous itemNext item.


(You must give a valid email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)

We only allow the following html tags em strong blockquote p br. After posting, there may be a short delay before your comment appears on the site